Planning and executing a research project using the PMBOK guide
DOI:
https://doi.org/10.22167/2675-441X-20220562Palavras-chave:
management; filter cake; sugar caneResumo
The concern with the sustainability of agricultural production has encouraged the search for alternative management of soil fertility, increasing the use of by-products as filter cake. Despite some studies proved its technical viability, it is not verified the widespread used. The aim of this work was to plan and execute a research project to obtain an overview of the perception of researchers and rural
producers about the use of filter cake in the fertilization of sugarcane culture, using the PMBOK guide. The planning and execution of the study project addressed two areas of knowledge in project management: scope and time. A questionnaire was made on Google Forms platform for the main stakeholders’s project (rural producers, researchers and employees in the sugar and alcohol sector). The
participants understood that the search for sustainability in the sugarcane cultivation is not only a market trend, but also a strategy for their business and/or research, and that they are up-to-date on the trends in the sector in which they work and are in agreement with their aim of achieving a more sustainable production system. The main factors considered as drivers for the use of the byproduct, were also mentioned as the main obstacles for its use in agricultural (price and dependence on distributors). We concluded that the project stakeholders have a positive perception about the use of filter cake as a fertilizer in the sugarcane
production. We suggest the creation of public policies to support by-products’s use since agricultural sustainability is a national interest.
Referências
Empresa Brasileira de Pesquisa Agropecuária EMBRAPA. O desafio do uso da água na agricultura brasileira. 2019.
Available in: <https://www.embrapa.br/agua-na-agricultura/sobre-o-tema>.
United Nations Organization (ONU). Department of Economic and Social Affairs, Population Division. World Population Perspectives, 2019.
Food and Agriculture Organization of the United Nations (FAO). FAOSTAT Statistical Database of the United Nation Food and Agriculture Organization (FAO) statistical division. 2019. Available in: <http://www.fao.org/faostat/en/>.
Companhia Nacional de Abastecimento (CONAB). Acompanhamento da safra brasileira de cana-de-cana-de-açúcar, v.6 - 1ª Safra 2019/2020. 2019; Brasília. Available in: <https://www.conab.gov.br/info-agro/safras/cana>.
Rodrigues R. Século XXI, o novo tempo da agroenergia renovável. (Fórum). Visão Agrícola. 2004; 4: 6-9.
Gilbert N. The disappearing nutrient. Nature. 2008; 461: 716-718.
Nunes Júnior D. Torta de filtro: de resíduo a produto nobre. Idea News. 2008; 8(92): 22-30.
Santos D.H.; Silva M.A.; Tiritan C.S.; Foloni J.S.S.; Echer F.R. Technological quality of sugarcane under fertilization with filter cake enriched with soluble phosphate. Agriambi. 2011; 15(5): 443-449.
Santos D.H.; Tiritan C.S.; Foloni J.S.S; Fabris L.B. Produtividade de cana-de-açúcar sob adubação com torta de filtro enriquecida com fosfato solúvel. Pesqui. Agropecu. Trop. 2010; 40(4): 454-461.
Dee B.M.; Haynes R.J.; Graham M.H. Changes in soil acidity and the size and activity of the microbial biomass in response to the addition of sugar mill wastes. Biol. Fertil. 2003; 37: 47-54.
Soltangheisi A.; Santos V.R.; Franco H.C.J.; Kolln O.; Vitti A.C.; Dias C.T.S.; et al. Phosphate Sources and Filter Cake Amendment Affecting Sugarcane Yield and Soil Phosphorus Fractions. Rev Bras Cienc Solo. 2019; 43: e0180227.
Prasad M. Response of Sugarcane to Filter Press Mud and N, P, and K Fertilizers. I. Effect on Sugarcane Yield and Sucrose Content. Agron J. 1976; 68(4): 539-543.
Rodella A.A.; Silva L.C.F.; Orlando Filho J. Effects of filter cake application on sugarcane yields, Turrialba. 1990; 40(3): 323-326.
González L.C.; Prado R.M.; Hernández A.R.; Caione G.; Selva E.P. Uso de torta de filtro enriquecida com fosfato natural e biofertilizantes em Latossolo Vermelho distrófico. Pesqui. Agropecu. Trop. 2014; 44(2): 135-141.
Project Management Institute (PMI). Um guia do conhecimento em gerenciamento de projetos (Guia PMBOK). 6ed. Project Management Institute, Filadélfia, Pensilvância, USA. 2017.
Likert R. A technique for the measurement of attitudes. Arch. psychol. 1932; 22: 140-155.
United States Department of Agriculture (USDA). The Nutrient Challenge of Sustainable Fertilizer Management. 2016. Available in: <https://nifa.usda.gov/blog/nutrient-challenge-sustainable-fertilizer management>.
Rumpel C.; Baumann K.; Remusat L.; Dignac M.F.; Barre P.; Deldicque D.; et al. Nanoscale evidence of contrasted processes for rootderived organic matter stabilization by mineral interactions depending on soil depth. Soil Biol. Biochem. 2015; 85: 82-88.
Keller M.; Oberson A.; Annaheim K.E.; Tamburini F.; Mäder P.; Mayer J.; et at. Phosphorus forms and enzymatic hydrolyzability of organic phosphorus in soils after 30 years of organic and conventional farming. J. Plant. Nutr. Soil Sci. 2012; 175(3): 385-393.
Withers P.J.; van Dijk K.C.; Neset T.S.; Nesme T.; Oenema O.; Rubaek G.H. Stewardship to tackle global phosphorus inefficiency: the case of Europe. Ambio. 2015; 44: 193-206.
Brasil. Ministério de Minas e Energia. RenovaBio. 2019. Available in: <http://antigo.mme.gov.br/web/guest/secretarias/petroleo-gas-natural-e-biocombustiveis/acoes-e-programas/programas/renovabio>.
Habets S.; Wild P.J.; Huijgen W.J.J.; van Eck E.R.H. The influence of thermochemical treatments on the lignocellulosic structure of wheat straw as studied by natural abundance 13C NMR. Bioresour. 2013; 146: 585-590.
Jiang D.; Zhuang D.; Fu J.; Huang Y.; Wen K. Bioenergy potential from crop residues in China: availability and distribution. Renew. Sustain. Energy Rev. 2012; 16(3): 1377-1382.
Amato Neto J. A era do ecobusiness: criando negócios sustentáveis. Manole Ltda. Barueri, São Paulo, Brazil. 2015.
Elkington J. Canibais com garfo e faca. Makron Books, São Paulo, São Paulo, Brazil. 2001. 2001.
Withers P.J.A.; Bowes M.J. Phosphorus the pollutant. In: Schaum C. (Ed.). Phosphorus: polluter and resource of the future: removal and recovery from wastewater. Integrated Environmental Technology Series. IWA Publishing, London, England. 2018.
Kemp R.; Pearson P. 2007. Final report of the MEI project measuring eco innovation. UM Merit, Maastricht, Holland.
; 1-120.
Schipper W.J.; Klapwijk A.; Potjer B.; Rulkens W.H.; Temmink B.G.; Kiestra F.D.G.; et al. Lijmbach. Phosphate recycling in the phosphorus industry. Environ. 2001; 22(11): 1337-1345.
Ulrich A.E.; Stauffacher M.; Krütli P.; Schnug P.; Frossard E. Tackling the phosphorus challenge: Time for reflection on three key limitations. Environ. 2013; 8: 137-144.
Downloads
Publicado
Como Citar
Edição
Seção
Licença
Copyright (c) 2022 Quaestum
Este trabalho está licenciado sob uma licença Creative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial 4.0 International License.
